> As I was one of those with in depth view on DOSBox and previously adamant on > leaving it on i386: > > - the best 64bit support, meaning the fastest, is in current SVN of DOSBox. > The 0.74-3 release is ok but very slow. > > - IMHO, do NOT use the fork of DOSBox for SDL2 unless that particular branch > is adding *only* SDL2 stuff. Otherwise it brings many more enhancements that > might clash eventually with the goals of DOSBox itself. >
Seems you know a lot, and I know little, about the inner workings. Want to collaborate? I can do the MacPorts things easily. Or just take it over? Here are the issues I saw: 1. we need a 64bit build 2. when I last tried the 64 bit build on Mojave, it was unusable due to the white screen for SDL, ergo the SDL2 version Please advise on optimal plan! Ken
