Being a (retired) programmer and sysadmin (although not significantly 
conversant with Mac-specific languages or APIs), I don't care too much about 
simple in itself - but the mere existence of Macs (in addition to predating 
Linux if you include Macs running older versions of classic Mac OS, like System 
6 or earlier) suggests that lots of people do.

Agreeing that homebrew has issues, I use it minimally (low single digit number 
of items). But if it comes down to either using homebrew or doing without or 
building myself and tracking updates myself (or, I suppose, writing a Portfile, 
but then I'd be on the hook to maintain it), homebrew doesn't necessarily suck 
THAT bad; it depends on the specific item

> On Jan 25, 2021, at 12:49, William Santos via macports-users 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I’ve never trusted Homebrew. The whole idea of “making it simple” just 
> doesn’t make sense when you’re modifying your system. You don’t want 
> “simple.” Simple breaks things. You want foolproof. Homebrew is foolish, 
> always has been.
> 
> I’m a huge fan of both MacPorts and Fink. I use them exclusivly for enhancing 
> my systems.
> 
> 
> 
>> On Jan 25, 2021, at 8:41 AM, Ken Cunningham 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> homebrew is in shambles.
>> 
>> their long-touted "no-sudo" and "no PATH" advantage from installing into 
>> /usr/local has been eliminated by Apple as the horrible security threat it 
>> always was. They have to retool into /opt/homebrew and make 10,000 builds 
>> respect the build args now.
>> 
>> They stripped out all their universal handling code a few years ago, can't 
>> put it back, and so can't do the critical universal builds any more. They 
>> tell everyone universal is wasteful, lipo things manually, and run the 
>> x86_64 homebrew on Apple Silicon.
>> 
>> So MacPorts, which works great from 10.4 PPC to 11.x arm64, is the place to 
>> be.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to