Hi, I would suggest maybe its worth pruning the gcc list a bit as well ? I believe e.g. gcc7 at least works all the way down to 10.5, perhaps even older ? Do we still need gcc 5, 6?
Chris > On 7 May 2021, at 1:35 pm, Christopher Nielsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Folks, > > We’re considering retirement of ports openmpi-clang33 and openmpi-clang34, to > reduce the number of openmpi-* ports we support. At the moment, the list is > quite large, and it’s becoming a challenge to thoroughly test and maintain > all of these: > > openmpi-clang @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-clang10 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-clang11 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-clang33 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-clang34 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-clang37 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-clang50 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-clang60 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-clang70 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-clang80 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-clang90 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-default @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-gcc5 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-gcc6 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-gcc7 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-gcc8 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-gcc9 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-gcc10 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > openmpi-gcc49 @4.1.1 science/openmpi > > While we hope to continue supporting as many of these as possible for the > foreseeable future, removing two of the oldest Clang versions would allow us > to provide more focus on the rest. > > Please let us know if you use the clang33 or clang34 variations, or know > anyone who does. > > Thanks, > -Chris
