> On 3 Jan 2022, at 5:18 pm, Maxim Abalenkov <maxim.abalen...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you for all of your replies and suggestions! I have written my own
> matrix multiplication script in order to test NumPy’s performance. Please
> find it attached. I’m using the MKL variant of NumPy. Strangely enough the
> `port variants py39-numpy` still returns:
>
> port variants py39-numpy
> py39-numpy has the variants:
> atlas: Use MacPorts ATLAS Libraries
> * conflicts with mkl openblas
> gcc10: Build using the MacPorts gcc 10 compiler
> * conflicts with gcc11 gcc8 gcc9 gccdevel gfortran gfortran
> gcc11: Build using the MacPorts gcc 11 compiler
> * conflicts with gcc10 gcc8 gcc9 gccdevel gfortran gfortran
> gcc8: Build using the MacPorts gcc 8 compiler
> * conflicts with gcc10 gcc11 gcc9 gccdevel gfortran gfortran
> gcc9: Build using the MacPorts gcc 9 compiler
> * conflicts with gcc10 gcc11 gcc8 gccdevel gfortran gfortran
> gccdevel: Build using the MacPorts gcc devel compiler
> * conflicts with gcc10 gcc11 gcc8 gcc9 gfortran gfortran
> [+]gfortran: Build using the MacPorts gcc 11 Fortran compiler
> * conflicts with gcc10 gcc11 gcc8 gcc9 gccdevel
> mkl: Use MacPorts MKL Libraries
> * conflicts with atlas openblas
> [+]openblas: Use MacPorts OpenBLAS Libraries
> * conflicts with atlas mkl
> universal: Build for multiple architectures
>
> Either I don’t understand the expected behaviour or my `port variants`
> command returns something else. I would expect it to show [+]gfortran and
> [+]mkl, not the [+]openblas.
No. The + sign indicates which variants are enabled by default, not what you
happened to be using yourself. For that the command you use below correctly
shows this.
> On the other hand, command `port installed py39-numpy` shows:
>
> port installed py39-numpy
> The following ports are currently installed:
> py39-numpy @1.21.5_1+gfortran+mkl
> py39-numpy @1.22.0_0+gfortran+mkl (active)
>
> Finally, I wasn’t able to specify 8 execution threads with `export
> MKL_NUM_THREADS=8`. NumPy was still using 4, but the `htop` reported 350–380%
> CPU load for the `/usr/bin/env python3 ./dgemm_numpy.py` process. I think
> this is good news!
>
> The `otool` command executed under
> `/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/core`
> shows that MKL backend is being used.
>
> otool -L _multiarray_umath.cpy
> _multiarray_umath.cpython-39-darwin.so:
>
> /opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.9/lib/libmkl_rt.2.dylib
> (compatibility version 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
> /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version
> 1311.0.0)
>
> I think I still need to experiment with OpenBLAS and compare the performance
> numbers. Thank you for your help!
>
> —
> Best wishes,
> Maxim
>
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import numpy as np
import time
print(np.__version__)
print(np.show_config())
m = 20000
k = 20000
n = 20000
t0 = time.time()
alpha = np.random.rand()
beta = np.random.rand()
A = np.random.rand(m, k)
B = np.random.rand(k, n)
C = np.random.rand(m, n)
t1 = time.time()
t = t1-t0
print('Generation time: {0:f}'.format(t))
print(' alpha: {0:f}, beta: {1:f}'.format(alpha, beta))
t0 = time.time()
C = alpha*np.matmul(A, B) + beta*C
t1 = time.time()
t = t1-t0
print('Multiplication time: {0:f}'.format(t))
## @eof dgemm_numpy.py
>
>
>>> On 29 Dec 2021, at 13:33, Joshua Root <j...@macports.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Maxim Abalenkov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I’m looking for guidance please. I would like to make sure, that I use all
>>> eight of my CPU cores, when I run Python’s 3.9.9 NumPy on my macOS BigSur
>>> 12.1. When I run my NumPy code, I see in ‘htop’, that only one ‘python’
>>> process is running and the core utilisation is 20–25%. I remember in the
>>> past, stock MacPorts NumPy installation would use Apple’s Accelerate
>>> library including the multithreaded BLAS and LAPACK (
>>> https://developer.apple.com/documentation/accelerate
>>> ). As I understand this is no longer the case.
>>>
>>> I run Python code using a virtual environment located under
>>>
>>> /opt/venv/zipfstime/lib/python3.9/site-packages/numpy/core
>>>
>>> When I change there and issue
>>>
>>> otool -L _multiarray_umath.cpython-39-darwin.so
>>>
>>> _multiarray_umath.cpython-39-darwin.so:
>>> @loader_path/../.dylibs/libopenblas.0.dylib (compatibility version
>>> 0.0.0, current version 0.0.0)
>>> /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version
>>> 1281.100.1)
>>>
>>> In other words, NumPy relies on openBLAS. Command `port variants openblas`
>>> returns
>>>
>>> OpenBLAS has the variants:
>>> g95: Build using the g95 Fortran compiler
>>> * conflicts with gcc10 gcc11 gcc8 gcc9 gccdevel
>>> gcc10: Build using the MacPorts gcc 10 compiler
>>> * conflicts with g95 g95 gcc11 gcc8 gcc9 gccdevel
>>> [+]gcc11: Build using the MacPorts gcc 11 compiler
>>> * conflicts with g95 g95 gcc10 gcc8 gcc9 gccdevel
>>> gcc8: Build using the MacPorts gcc 8 compiler
>>> * conflicts with g95 g95 gcc10 gcc11 gcc9 gccdevel
>>> gcc9: Build using the MacPorts gcc 9 compiler
>>> * conflicts with g95 g95 gcc10 gcc11 gcc8 gccdevel
>>> gccdevel: Build using the MacPorts gcc devel compiler
>>> * conflicts with g95 g95 gcc10 gcc11 gcc8 gcc9
>>> [+]lapack: Add Lapack/CLapack support to the library
>>> native: Force compilation on machine to get fully optimized library
>>> universal: Build for multiple architectures
>>>
>>> I tried installing the “native” variant of OpenBLAS port with `sudo port
>>> install openblas +native` and setting the environment variable
>>> `OMP_NUM_THREADS=8`, but I didn’t see any improvement when running my
>>> Python code. I would welcome your help and guidance on this subject.
>>>
>> I'm using py39-numpy with default variants:
>>
>> % port installed py39-numpy openblas
>> The following ports are currently installed:
>> OpenBLAS @0.3.19_0+gcc11+lapack (active)
>> py39-numpy @1.21.5_1+gfortran+openblas (active)
>>
>> I see Python using around 600% CPU on my 6-core machine when running this
>> basic benchmark
>> script:<https://gist.github.com/markus-beuckelmann/8bc25531b11158431a5b09a45abd6276>
>>
>> If you try that and see how many cores it uses, that will at least tell you
>> if there is something different about your code. If it doesn't use all the
>> cores for you, there are some other environment variables that OpenBLAS
>> looks at that you could check:
>> <https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS#setting-the-number-of-threads-using-environment-variables>
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>
