On Sun, 18 Sep 2022, Bill Cole wrote: > > And because XV is broken I can't continue with upgrading following > > ports > > You can get around that by explicitly excluding xv, e.g.: > > port -v upgrade active and not xv
Thanks; I must get used to those logical conditions (FreeBSD ports has no such feature). Now have a problem with dosbox (seems that "universal_archs" isn't) which I'll post next; it's likely my fault, and I don't want to contaminate the bugs database with spurious reports. -- Dave
