Today I successfully installed qt5-qtwebengine, and py312-spyder after that, by going back from Xcode 16.2 to 16.1, downgrading CLT’s as well.
What I did was: Rename Xcode.app —> Xcode162.app in /Applications Rename Developer —> Developer162 in /Library Install Xcode version 16.1 (downloaded from developer.apple.com <http://developer.apple.com/>) Install Command Line Tools 16.1 (downloaded from developer.apple.com <http://developer.apple.com/>) and then sudo xcodebuild -license sudo port clean qt5-qtwebengine sudo port install qt5-qtwebengine (successful) sudo port install py312-spyder (successful) So apparently Xcode 16.2 was the culprit, but with it more than 900 ports were successfully installed, and just qt5-qtwebengine failed. I have saved the log files for both the unsuccessful (Xcode 16.2) and successful (Xcode 16.1) installations of qt5-qtwebengine. Should I file a bug report for qt5-qtwebengine attaching them to the report, or is this something pertaining to upstream or up to Apple? And finally, is it a problem to have most of the ports installed using Xcode 16.2 and some ports using Xcode 16.1? Thanks Franco > On 15 Dec 2024, at 18:46, Franco Vaccari <[email protected]> wrote: > > Installation of py312-spyder has just failed on my system (Mac OS 15.2 on > Apple Silicon, Xcode 16.2, CLT’s 16.2.0.0.1.1733547573) due to failure to > install qt5-qtwebengine. > > I didn’t expect this problem since a couple of days ago I successfully > installed py312-spyder on another similar machine, but now that I think about > it that machine was at Mac OS 15.1 and Xcode 16.1 at the time, and it was > updated to Mac OS 15.2 and Xcode 16.2 *after* installing all the ports. > > In the qt5-qtwebengine log file the first error appears at step 3009. I’m > ready to file a bug report with the full 5.2 MB log file, but I’m not sure if > it belongs to qt5-qtwebengine or to one of its dependencies, since for > instance ../../3rdparty/chromium/third_party/freetype/src/src/gzip/ftgzip.c > is mentioned. > > What should be the correct way of reporting this? Below is the part of log > relative to step 3009. > > Thanks > > Franco > > <SNIP> > > >
