At 13:36 -0500 11/12/08, Benjamin Stiglitz wrote: > I should say that the RubySpec effort is also useful for > testing MacRuby, in as much as it provides coverage for > the vast majority of the behavior which MacRuby shares > with 1.9 ...
My understanding is that the 1.9 coverage in the RubySpec suite is pretty skeletal at present, but that simply means that we need to create more 1.9-specific tests, as well as some tests for MacRuby, per se. FWIW, any MacRubySpec (:-) effort should be coordinated with the fine folks running http://rubyspecresults.org/ -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/weblog +1 650-873-7841 Technical editing and writing, programming, and web development _______________________________________________ MacRuby-devel mailing list MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
