That's correct :)
Eloy
On 10 jul 2009, at 19:31, Mike Sassak wrote:
Is the critical tag reserved for specs that cause an unrecoverable
error in the interpreter, or can they also sometimes indicate
priority? In other words, if a tag marked critical starts failing at
the assertion/expectation level, rather than at the interpreter
level, should that tag be changed to "fails"?
Mike
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:59 AM, Eloy Duran
<eloy.de.en...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes indeed, the ones that segfault should be tagged as critical.
To list all current critical tags:
$ ./mspec/bin/mspec tag --list critical -B ./spec/macruby.mspec :full
Cheers,
Eloy
On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:21 AM, Laurent Sansonetti wrote:
I think the plan is to tag these as "critical". At least that's what
we have been doing for a while. Eloy might want to confirm this :-)
Laurent
On Jul 9, 2009, at 7:16 PM, Perry Smith wrote:
How do others feel about changing the tags on the tests that get
segv faults to something like "faults". At least with my system,
the whole testing chain stops at the segv faults.
Thanks,
Perry
_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
