#571: #respond_to? should return false for unimplemented methods
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  hongli...@…          |       Owner:  lsansone...@…        
     Type:  defect               |      Status:  new                  
 Priority:  blocker              |   Milestone:                       
Component:  MacRuby              |    Keywords:                       
---------------------------------+------------------------------------------

Comment(by maxime.curi...@…):

 Replying to [comment:1 lsansone...@…]:
 > Let's follow MRI here and register a common implementation symbol for
 unimplemented methods, then refresh the UNAVAILABLE_IMP macro to also
 check for this symbol.

 I followed Laurent's recommendation and added the test (whether the
 current method is equal to rb_f_notimplement) to the UNAVAILABLE_IMP
 macro.

 To test it, I updated spec/frozen/core/process/fork_spec.rb, to skip the
 old spec. I am new to MacRuby so I don't know if changing specs in the
 frozen directory or specifying specs just for our implementation is the
 way to go. Please share any criticism/comment you may about my patch.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://www.macruby.org/trac/ticket/571#comment:2>
MacRuby <http://macruby.org/>

_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

Reply via email to