how about just working nicely with rvm?
On 16/09/2010, at 1:58 PM, Ryan Davis wrote: > > On Sep 15, 2010, at 15:30 , Iain Barnett wrote: > >> >> On 15 Sep 2010, at 22:43, Ryan Davis wrote: >> >>> >>> rubygems and/or macruby should probably be patched to include RUBY_ENGINE >>> somewhere in the gem path. >> >> That's a really good idea. Either that or just accept that macruby is a >> separate thing altogether and have MAC_GEM_PATH etc etc. Proliferation of >> vars doesn't bother me, they only get set once. > > yes, but then you have a proliferation of rubygem implementations... I'd > prefer we work out something that works for everyone so that when you say > 1.3.8 of rubygems it means the same across all ruby impls. > > > _______________________________________________ > MacRuby-devel mailing list > MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel _______________________________________________ MacRuby-devel mailing list MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
