Yep, no worries. I probably should have explicitly said that "hello after
proc" doesn't print, which is the correct behavior.
-Gabriel
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 12:07 AM, Rob Gleeson <r...@flowof.info> wrote:
>
> On 31 Mar 2011, at 08:05, Rob Gleeson wrote:
>
>
>
>
> def trigger_action(sender)
>
> a_proc = Proc.new { |var|
>
> puts "hello in proc"
>
> return 1
>
> }
>
> a_proc.call('test')
>
> puts "hello after proc"
>
> end
>
> That code runs without triggering an exception, and prints only "hello in
> proc" as expected. However, this variation on the code behaves differently:
>
>
> This shouldn't print "hello after proc". an explicit return should not
> return control to the caller within a method, it should return for that
> method.
> F. ex, 1 should be the return value of trigger_action.
>
> If it were a lambda, that behavior is expected (printing "hello after
> proc"), so I guess there's a bug somewhere.
>
> P.S: Gabriel, sorry, I replied to you directly instead of to the list :)
>
> - Rob
>
>
> Oops, sorry Garbiel. I misread your post. "hello IN proc" is indeed printed
> and expected. :)
>
> - Rob
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
