I'd noticed that too. I thought Strings were actually NSStrings. Ricky
On Apr 18, 2011, at 9:52 AM, Petr Kaleta wrote: > Btw: it seems, that something has changed in ruby primitives classes > implementation, described in here > http://www.macruby.org/documentation/tutorial.html (this example > http://cl.ly/2Y382r0w331O230z1Q3D) because "foo".class is not NSCFString but > String http://cl.ly/110Y0O0D1k3y1G2e2j2X > > - Petr > > On Apr 18, 2011, at 3:45 PM, Petr Kaleta wrote: > >> Hi I'm a little bit confused about basic ruby classes implementation. Ruby >> Hash is internally implemented as NSDictionary/NSMutableDictionary? So for >> example if I need to implement hash table, I can use ruby Hash? So the >> performance will be exactly same compared to NSDictionary? >> >> - Petr >> _______________________________________________ >> MacRuby-devel mailing list >> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel > > _______________________________________________ > MacRuby-devel mailing list > MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel _______________________________________________ MacRuby-devel mailing list MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
