I think it would be easier to collaborate on a project like this if we had a 
good forum - where threads can be sticked, announcements be posted etc

It's one of the things I miss from the PHP world, where there are lots of 
communities using forums very effectively. From support to collaboration, to 
just getting to know each other.

I actually came to Ruby (Rails) so I could move away from forum-based sites 
(which I've been into for years) but I'd be willing to do one last one for Ruby 
if enough people wanted it - we could have separate categories for projects 
like MacRuby, Rails, etc, with their respective leaders having mod permissions 
to post announcements/stick threads etc (but the low level 'spam' moderating 
etc would be left to me and my mod team.

Does that interest anyone?

Aston


On 13 Sep 2011, at 21:37, Jeremy Hinegardner wrote:

> True, waiting on Laurent for this may be the wrong approach. I have done
> a fair bit of my own investigation, and do not know where to go next, hence
> posting here.
> 
> In short, yes, Amalgalite uses and exposes more features of SQLite than are
> generally available from default builds, and even OSX's non-default build,
> hence embedding it in the ruby extension itself.
> 
> To help, I would really like to understand the pros/cons of using flat vs.
> twolevel namespaces with respect to MacRuby and extensions.
> 
> enjoy,
> 
> -jeremy
> 
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:11:06PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>> I'm not Laurent, but I'll also say that simply waiting for him to answer 
>> this question may be the wrong approach.  For one, the project (in order to 
>> truly be successful) needs to move away from the "single point of failure" 
>> model that over-reliance on Laurent has historically represented.  This 
>> means that it needs to grow some of its own talent and expertise and the 
>> "wait and see what Laurent says" approach runs counter to this objective.  
>> Second, this may be a problem that really needs to be addressed in the 
>> Amalgalite gem itself since any component which ships with duplicate 
>> technology to what's in the OS runs the risk of the same namespace (and 
>> other) conflicts.  Are the additional compile-time features really that 
>> important to the gem?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> - Jordan
>> 
>> On Sep 13, 2011, at 8:12 AM, Jeremy Hinegardner wrote:
>> 
>>> Thanks, and lets hope Laurent can tell us what to do here :-).
>>> 
>>> enjoy,
>>> 
>>> -jeremy
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:39:37PM -0700, Matt Aimonetti wrote:
>>>> That's a good question, and honestly I have no idea :(
>>>> Laurent is on vacation so he's not checking the mailing list, but he should
>>>> be back soon and hopefully he will have an answer.
>>>> 
>>>> - Matt
>>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Jeremy Hinegardner 
>>>> <jer...@hinegardner.org
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hey all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I develop the Amalgalite gem[1] and it ships with its own copy of SQLite.
>>>>> It does this as it adds in additional compile-time features, and I try and
>>>>> keep it as current as posssible.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The problem is that since MacRuby is linked to CoreServices etc, the 
>>>>> sqlite
>>>>> library that ships with OSX gets linked at runtime before the sqlite
>>>>> library
>>>>> that is built into the amalgalite gem extension.  I've encountered this
>>>>> before[2] with amalgalite, when it was loaded with my 'hitimes' gem (which
>>>>> on osx links
>>>>> against -framework CoreServes).
>>>>> 
>>>>> I am wondering what the appropriate approach is here. I was able to fix
>>>>> this in
>>>>> MRI by compiling MRI with -twolevel_namespace and I think there is an open
>>>>> ticket
>>>>> with ruby-core to see if MRI on osx should be compiled with that flag.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I attempted to compile MacRuby with -twolevel_namespace to resolve this,
>>>>> and I
>>>>> was unsuccessful. There appeared to be other flags that conflicted with 
>>>>> it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would expect something like this may also affect the nokogiri gem as
>>>>> limxml2
>>>>> is also a system library on osx, and may conflict with the version that
>>>>> nokogiri
>>>>> expects.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thoughts? Opinions? I'm sure this is a rare case, Amalgalite may be the
>>>>> only
>>>>> project that could experience an issue like this. What is the best way to
>>>>> handle
>>>>> this in the MacRuby ecosystem?
>>>>> 
>>>>> enjoy,
>>>>> 
>>>>> -jeremy
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1] - https://github.com/copiousfreetime/amalgalite
>>>>> [2] -
>>>>> https://github.com/copiousfreetime/amalgalite/blob/master/lib/amalgalite/sqlite3/version.rb#L42-L56-54
>>>>> --
>>>>> ========================================================================
>>>>> Jeremy Hinegardner                              jer...@hinegardner.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>>>>> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
>>>>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> ========================================================================
>>> Jeremy Hinegardner                              jer...@hinegardner.org 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MacRuby-devel mailing list
>>> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
>>> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
>> 
> 
> -- 
> ========================================================================
> Jeremy Hinegardner                              jer...@hinegardner.org 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MacRuby-devel mailing list
> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

_______________________________________________
MacRuby-devel mailing list
MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel

Reply via email to