Yes, i do always. Submitting without manually code signing does not work anyway … My SubtitleResync App is already a few months in the store and I regularly submit releases with manual code signing approx according to the procedure of Elliot. That worked fine until last week when I submitted another app. Elliot is right, as you can read in the response from the review team, "your app has proceeded to review, but . . . . " Rob
> > Rob, have you tried to use codesign as Eliott suggested in his blog post? > > - Matt > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 4:19 AM, rob ista <rob.i...@me.com> wrote: > >> I don't know if this is a xcode bug .. I'm still developing on SL with >> xcode 4.0.2 because Lion and 4.2 gives me too much trouble and crashes. The >> automated response in the review process about the codesigning is quite new >> and I have not seen it before (on the same delvelopment machine with the >> same tools) until recently when submitting a new macruby app. It complaints >> about the macruby framework itself, all .rbo and .dylib files from the >> framework and all app-specific .rbo files from the deployment phase of the >> app. It worries me a bit because it seems to shut the door to macruby apps >> in the near future. It 's now only : >> >> >> Dear Developer, >> >> We have discovered one or more issues with your recent binary submission >> for "SMSReCall". Your app has proceeded to review, but the following issues >> should be corrected in your next submission: >> >> *Invalid Signature* - the nested app bundle Ruby >> (SMSReCall.app/Contents/Frameworks/MacRuby.framework) is not signed, the >> signature is invalid, or it is not signed with an Apple submission >> certificate. Refer to the Code Signing and Application Sandboxing >> Guide<http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Security/Conceptual/CodeSigningGuide/AboutCS/AboutCS.html>for >> more information. >> >> *Invalid Signature* - the executable >> SMSReCall.app/Contents/Frameworks/MacRuby.framework/Versions/Current/usr/lib/libmacruby.1.9.2dylib >> is not signed, the signature is invalid, or it is not signed with an Apple >> submission certificate. Refer to the Code Signing and Application >> Sandboxing >> Guide<http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Security/Conceptual/CodeSigningGuide/AboutCS/AboutCS.html>for >> more information. >> >> *Invalid Signature* - the executable etc etc etc >> Rob >> >> - - - - >> >> Thanks for sharing Eliott, that seems to be a bug with Xcode and it should >> be affecting all 3rd party frameworks, not just MacRuby. >> Quite strange, but thanks for showing how you worked around the signing >> problem. >> >> - Matt >> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Elliot Temple <curi at >> curi.us<http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel>> >> wrote: >> >>> * http://curi.us/1538-macruby-and-the-mac-app-store >> *>* >> *>* Got my game in the app store. Hope these notes help others get things >> *>* working too. >> *>* >> *>* -- Elliot Temple >> *>* http://beginningofinfinity.com/ >> *>* >> *>* >> *>* >> *>* >> *>* _______________________________________________ >> *>* MacRuby-devel mailing list >> * >>> * MacRuby-devel at >>> lists.macosforge.org<http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel> >> *>* >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel<http://listsmacosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel> >> *>* >> * >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MacRuby-devel mailing list >> MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org >> http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macruby-devel/attachments/20111024/eeada57f/attachment-0001.html> > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 16:14:45 -0400 > From: "Perry E. Metzger" <pe...@piermont.com> > To: "MacRuby development discussions." > <macruby-devel@lists.macosforge.org> > Subject: Re: [MacRuby-devel] Advice for Total Tyro > Message-ID: <20111024161445.0333f...@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 11:44:42 -0700 "Jordan K. Hubbard" > <j...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> On Oct 23, 2011, at 10:40 PM, David Frantz wrote: >> >>> Well maybe the choice of words isn't great but we have yet to see >>> a version one released. Maybe version one isn't that far off, >>> but I think it is fair to say most people approach version one of >>> anything software related with reservations. >> >> I'm not sure version numbers should be held in such high esteem. >> OpenSSL, for example, has been in production for years and years >> now and they've not reached version 1.0 either. ;-) >> > > No longer true, OpenSSL is now past 1.0.... > > -- > Perry E. Metzger pe...@piermont.com > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > MacRuby-devel mailing list > MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org > http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel > > > End of MacRuby-devel Digest, Vol 44, Issue 40 > ********************************************* _______________________________________________ MacRuby-devel mailing list MacRuby-devel@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macruby-devel
