On 8/4/10 9:42 AM, Rick C. wrote:
>
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have a question regarding choosing a domain name. At this time I have
> only one app on a domain/site named after my company. I tried before to
> name the site after my app but it was difficult since the name was
> already taken. I will soon be adding another app to the same site named
> after my company as once again the domain with the same name as my new
> app is already taken. My question is do you think having multiple apps
> on a company named website is good enough? Or should I also have
> additional sites named after my apps that maybe redirect to my company
> site to increase awareness? And if so how about the naming part? Should
> I use something like "myapp.net" since the .com is already taken? Or try
> to make a .com work for example "myappformac.com" or similar? Thank you
> for the input.
>

I'm going to be contrarian here and suggest that you stick with a 
company website, without separate domains for product pages.  My basis 
for this suggestion is http://panic.com, http://red-sweater.com, 
http://flyingmeat.com, and http://barebones.com. This is a good model 
for an indie developer to follow: it builds brand awareness of both your 
apps and your company. When  you release a new product, it automatically 
benefits from the positive brand awareness of your company. It also 
reduces complexity in your marketing efforts: you only have to manage a 
single domain. For a solo/indie developer, reducing complexity is a 
winner because time is a finite resource.

An interesting example of a company using tons of product-specific 
domains is Sofa: http://www.madebysofa.com/. For them, it makes sense to 
do this because their company doesn't just focus on Mac development, but 
also design projects as well. Their company site brands them as a 
design/development shop with really good taste, and it probably helps 
them get contract/design/consulting work. They don't want just to be 
recognized as "the developers of Checkout."

However, this approach also has costs. Their apps do not benefit from 
brand awareness of the company. In fact, if you look at the domain site 
for Checkout (http://www.checkoutapp.com/) you'll see a link to "Werck," 
which is the name (and the parking page) for a joint venture between 
Sofa and the developers of AccountEdge (accounting software). If I'm a 
retailer looking for Mac-based POS software, I would evaluate Checkout 
on the basis of its features and what I learned at the app website, but 
looking at the "Werck" site would tell me nothing at all. This might 
actually detract from my evaluation of the software, since part of my 
confidence level is my sense of the company standing behind the 
software--will they be around?

Just some food for thought.

Kevin

-- 
Kevin Walzer
Code by Kevin
http://www.codebykevin.com

Reply via email to