You can do, and I have seen it done. The method I suggested allows the
packages for each to be modified by series. Say something had to be
altered in the packaging for Januty but not for Intrepid with the scheme
I suggested it could be done with ease and still keep the same upstream
version.
If you take a look at my PPA you can see
https://launchpad.net/~adamhorden/+archive/ppa what I have done so far.
These packages work when I tested them.
So you are suggesting that we have just one package and modify the
control files so it can be built for Intrepid and Januty?
Adam
cyberdork33 wrote:
can you not put multiple versions in one of the debian control files
so that you have one package that applies multiple releases? I thought
I had seen that somewhere. It doesn't make sense to have to keep
separate versions for each release.
On Mar 14, 2009, at 8:40 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
[email protected] wrote:
Hi,
Henrik I noticed the packages you built for Januty in the PPA.
Why the version bump on the Januty package to the Intrepid package for
applesmc-dkms? I did a diff and I cannot see anything changed other
than
the packaging. Is this correct?
Yes - I was simply being lazy, since the old version could not be
uploaded to jaunty without some kind of name change.
[...]
I have the new packages for 0.14.4 for Januty updated locally with the
version appended as above. I was going to add them to the PPA today but
Henrik has all ready updated the packages.
Feel free to upload them - the naming convention you mentioned is
certainly better than the current.
Cheers,
Henrik
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mactel-support
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mactel-support
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~mactel-support
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~mactel-support
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
