Alex, I've said this before, these one-liners clutter the list much  
more than any content you'd post.

   So, what I'm saying here, to be clear, is rather than post a one  
line note about what you're doing or planning to do without either  
including any content or asking outright for specific assistance, do  
either say in real terms what you're doing, by showing the list some  
actual content, or pose a clear request either to the list for  
specific assistance with what you're doing.

   Otherwise you're simply using bandwidth without contributing.

   I'm saying this to be clear, as I'd really like to see this  
behavior change without my having to come up with some ridiculous list  
rule about such, K?…  <smile>

   So this is just a friendly reminder not only to you, but to the  
list as a whole, to please have some consideration for other listers.   
Said simply, don't post unless you have something helpful / useful to  
share with everyone.  If we all do this then the list will really run  
smoothly and we won't accidentally be stepping on eachother's toes.  - 
Make sense?…

   Thanks for taking time to read, and I wish you all a lovely weekend!…

Smiles,

Cara  :)
---
View my Online Portfolio at:
http://www.onemodelplace.com/CaraQuinn

On Mar 7, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Alex Jurgensen wrote:


Hi,

It isn't closeness, just unclutterness of the list.

Thanks,
Alex,


On 28-Feb-09, at 11:39 PM, sandi sørensen wrote:

>
> hi.
> Alex how about you just tell us all what you have done instead of all
> that closeness?
> sounds like a better approach:)
> espeak is another open speech which you can sortta use with mac as it
> is.
> When i say like i do it's cause... you can use it with irc like tail-f
> -n1 filename|speak -s 300 and your irc-client speaks.
> It works okay for both irssi and xchat.
> so i was wanting too use it as we use fred alex and so on.
> To ryan:
> for 6 month ago you could not use flightgear as a blind person you can
> today.
> Nothing is impossible the impossible things just takes more time:)
>
> /sandi
>  now On Mar 7, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Alex Jurgensen wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I figured out what needs to be done. I'm willing to let anyone who
>> wants into the project I've started to do this. Just E-mail me at: 
>> [email protected]
>> . I have done research on doing tis.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Alex,
>>
>>
>> On 7-Mar-09, at 11:39 AM, Scott Howell wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Yep, there is a package on I believe the second DVD. I dont' have my
>>> DVD handy, but I think it is in a folder called extras or optional
>>> packages. You'll know it when you encounter it.
>>> On Feb 28, 2009, at 10:59 PM, sandi sørensen wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Greg thank you for your answer")
>>>> I was not aware i had any devtools with my mac. will go and look in
>>>> to
>>>> what i got with the mini. I am nearly sure i did not get any with
>>>> the
>>>> mac book air, but i can be wrong.
>>>> /sandi
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 7, 2009, at 10:09 AM, Greg Kearney wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We looked into it at Curtin but had to stop do to other issue
>>>>> here.
>>>>> We
>>>>> did not get very far. The basic process is to make a sysnsisier
>>>>> for
>>>>> each vendor of voices. There is sample code for doing this in the
>>>>> developer tools that come with the mac.
>>>>>
>>>>> Greg
>>>>> On Mar 1, 2009, at 12:27 PM, sandi sørensen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Greg agree.
>>>>>> But my main problem so far have been to find out where the voices
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> selected.
>>>>>> I dont doubt i will find a way to make it work If ivox voices can
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> added so can espeak:)
>>>>>> of course we would have too live with the 370 words pr minute
>>>>>> rule
>>>>>> or
>>>>>> so i think but that ought too be fast enough for a start at
>>>>>> least.
>>>>>> Greg was it not you who actually tried making it native at some
>>>>>> point ?
>>>>>> /sandi
>>>>>> On Mar 7, 2009, at 9:42 AM, Greg Kearney wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I vote for making them native voices.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mar 1, 2009, at 11:37 AM, sandi sørensen wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hi all.
>>>>>>>> For some days ago some one asked  me if espeak could be used as
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> default voice on the mac so well can it ?
>>>>>>>> I am considering looking in too it to see what can be done
>>>>>>>> about
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>> I can see too ways 1 make it natively show up in the voiceover
>>>>>>>> voice
>>>>>>>> selection or 2 make a hack around it.
>>>>>>>> But before i do alot of things  any ideas?
>>>>>>>> /sandi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>>
>
>
>>





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to