I stand corrected. Thanks.

On Mar 9, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Jacob Schmude wrote:

>
> I think you're confusing the Mac with the iPhone. Jobs did not want
> flash on the iPhone, and the iPhone consequently doesn't have it.
> He probably doesn't want flash on the Mac either, I kind of agree with
> him given how badly it's misused, but the fact is the plugin is there
> and Adobe has proven outright hostile to any requests for
> accessibility on any platform other than Windows. Not surprising
> really, seeing as how most of the accessibility stuff was done by
> Macromedia before Adobe acquired it, and Adobe doesn't exactly have a
> great reputation when it comes to accessibility in general.
> I've never received a hostile reply from anyone at Apple concerning
> flash accessibility, though there's not much Apple can do given that
> they do not have access to the source of the flash plugin short of
> making their own version of it and that's not likely to happen.
>
> On Mar 9, 2009, at 20:40, louie wrote:
>
>>
>> The way I heard it on Leo Laporte podcast was Jobs did not want  
>> flash.
>>
>> On Mar 9, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Mike Arrigo wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, Adobe does not currently expose flash elements in a
>>> way that
>>> voice over can use, and last I heard, they didn't think there was
>>> enough mac
>>> users to spend resources on this.
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: <[email protected]>
>>> To: "MacVisionaries" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 1:55 PM
>>> Subject: flash and VO
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> One of the things that I have noticed since I started using VO is
>>>> that
>>>> it doesn't recognize flash players. Does anyone know if there is  
>>>> any
>>>> plan to make VO accessible with flash?  It is really frustrating
>>>> when
>>>> I can't activate a movie on a website because it's in a flash
>>>> player.
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Alena
>>>> Blog: http://blind-gal.blogspot.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>
>> louie
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>
>    The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a
> thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot
> possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to
> get at or repair.
>       --Douglas Adams
>
>
> >

louie
[email protected]




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to