Wouldn't make sense, seeing as Apple has hinted the classic won't be around much longer.
On Mar 11, 2009, at 11:02, Dean Wilcox wrote: > > A talking Iphone? Lets keep it simple for now and go for the iPod > clasic! > > At 14:32 11/03/2009, you wrote: > >> hmm, nice cheery outlook you've got there Will, lol. >> >> I should imagine the main thrust of this will be the playlist >> selection. 4gb of songs would be quite a hefty amount to flick >> through to try and locate a particular album. >> >> What struck me as interesting about this though is that the shuffle >> has no screen, so people who're going to take advantage of >> playlisting >> are relying solely on VO, just like us. If nothing else it's nice to >> see Apple openly putting some faith into a spoken interface. If this >> is a hit with the consumers, it could go a long way towards speeding >> up talking interfaces for their other products. >> >> *cough* iPhone? iPhone Mr Jobs? >> >> On 3/11/09, william lomas <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> hi apple now have a talking ipod shuffle. what is the point >>> in this? >>> if people can't even tell what song they are listening to that >>> crazy lol >>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG. >> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.9/1992 - Release Date: >> 3/9/2009 7:20 PM > > > > > The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or repair. --Douglas Adams --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
