I don't know that its a matter of liking or not liking someone's
contribution, but I pretty much agree in spirit.
Over the years I have cluttered yp my Windows machines with
alternatives. I also have cluttered up both Firefox and Thunderbird with
add ons. After a while it gets very messy.
I hope I do not maie this happen with the Mac. I will try to make
the best use of the native apps and if I find anything that seems not to
work, there is the Apple Accessibility team.
There may well be good alternatives out there but often I hear
people share shortcomings with those. I also hear people sharing
solutions to issues with the native apps so do we end up at the same
point? Seems we do.
From The Believer. . .
What if it were true?
[email protected]
On 8/29/2014 6:59 AM, Christopher Hallsworth wrote:
Hi all
You may or may not like me for saying this, but as far as I am concerned
iTunes is the way to go if you want a fully accessible with all buttons
labelled bla bla bla way to manage your iDevice. All alternatives seem
to fall short one way or another. So I say deal with iTunes unless you
can cope with the frustration of mostly unlabelled controls of the
alternatives. Just my £0.02 worth.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
