I guess I'm not clear on how this would work. Doesn't the VPN server 
have to run on your firewall? So when I try to connect from the public 
internet to something inside my private network I first have to make a 
VPN connection and then I have access to private network assets. So if I 
have a VPN server running on a machine inside the firewall, how do I get 
to it to bring up the VPN connection? Seems like a chicken and egg kind 
of problem. I suspect most folks use the VPN built into their little 
firewall/NAT/router box. To use a desktop you would need two network 
connections, one to the public network and one to the private network 
and then the router/firewall/VPN would control which traffic can cross 
over the demarcation point. I guess it's possible to run the VPN on a 
machine on the internal network and then have the firewall portmap the 
VPN ports to the internal host. Is that typical?

CB

Frank Ventura wrote:
> Another thing of interest to note is that if you have a Windows XP, 2003, 
> 2008, etc machine on the home or office network you need to VPN into you can 
> use that as the VPN host. The ability to do this is built right into Windows. 
> The beauty of this is that the VPN client built into OSX on the Mac works 
> flawlessly with that and is of course totally accessible. So if you need, for 
> example, to VPN into the network at your home from a remote location and you 
> have a Windows machine at home you can set that up to accept the incoming VPN 
> connection and then use the Macs VPN client to connect to it. No additional 
> software to install/purchase.
> Frank
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Esther
> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 5:52 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: VPN revisited
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It's worth commenting as an addition to Dónal's very nice summary of  
> VPN clients that there was a specific requirement for software to work  
> with "Open VPN", which is one popular version of VPN software that  
> works cross-platform and which was the chosen VPN software version for  
> his organization.
>
> On this issue of inaccessible status menu icons, I'm moved to wonder,  
> what does Dropbox do?  For background, Dropbox is a popular file  
> sharing tool that works cross-platform.  You register at Dropbox.com  
> when you download the software and you're initially given 2GB of space  
> (more if you upgrade to a paid membership).  Files that you move into  
> your Dropbox folder on one machine can be accessed from your Dropbox  
> on another machine (which could be a Windows or linux machine), or  
> through a web interface to your account.  You can also email people  
> links to files in your Dropbox and update/sync versions of the file  
> across your Dropboxes.
>
> Anyway, there's a very odd interface on the Mac, because the status  
> bar icon that you need to access to open your Dropbox folder also  
> can't be navigated to with VO-M twice, or Control-F8 or combinations  
> of these with arrow keys under VoiceOver.  What I found does work is  
> to bring up your window chooser menu (VO-F2 twice) under Finder.   
> Then, if you have Dropbox installed, you see a window called  
> "untitled".  If you select that from the window chooser menu and route  
> your mouse cursor (VO-Command-F5) to that "window" and click (VO-Shift- 
> Space or any "hardware clicks" by pressing a mouse button, trackpad,  
> or the "5" on a numeric keypad with NumPad Commander activated) you  
> get the Dropbox menu to come up as though you had been able to  
> navigate to the status bar icon and open the menu.
>
> I haven't seen this documented in other forums or lists, except for my  
> own comments on another list and some months later on this list.   
> Whatever Dropbox is doing, I suspect they're not using NSStatusItem or  
> the Extra menu item that Apple uses -- at least not in any  
> conventional way.
>
> It is also possible to work with preference file setups through GUI- 
> based plist editors, though I think it is more straightforward to just  
> use the terminal command line if you know what parameters you want to  
> change.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Esther
>
> Donal Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi Christina,
>>
>> VPN stands for "virtual Private Network".  Basically, it allows me to
>> connect into my work network from home.  I can see the network disks,
>> send mail, and access all the resources I need to access as though I'm
>> in the office.
>>
>> hth
>>
>> Donal
>> On 29 Sep 2009, at 23:25, Christina wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> This may sound dumb but for my information, could you please let me
>>> know what a VPN is.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Christina
>>> On Sep 29, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Donal Fitzpatrick wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Ok I've been playing around with two VPN clients since I raised this
>>>> topic about a month ago.  The two clients I've looked at are
>>>> Tunnelblick and Viscosity.  In case anyone needs to use a VPN, my
>>>> thoughts on both are given below.
>>>>
>>>> 1.  Viscosity.  I chose this one first because, as Esther said at  
>>>> the
>>>> time this topic was discussed, it supports applescript.  The
>>>> installation for this application follows standard OSX conventions,
>>>> and creates no problems with VO whatsoever.
>>>>
>>>> The application is not very accessible in the typical sense of the
>>>> word.  It uses a status menu (NSStatusItem which it locates in the
>>>> vicinity of time machine, and the other Extra menu items Apple use.
>>>> Problems with such status menus are well documented here and on  
>>>> other
>>>> lists so I won't delve into that again.  However, suffice it to say
>>>> that because the status menu is inaccessible, it precludes getting  
>>>> to
>>>> the menu items, preferences dialog and other aspects of the  
>>>> software.
>>>> I did ask a sighted colleague to open the preferences dialog for me,
>>>> and it was navigable, but not easily so.
>>>>
>>>> I mentioned earlier that Viscosity does support applescript.  One  
>>>> can
>>>> easily create scripts to connect to, and disconnect from the VPN.
>>>> This feature makes the application usable.  Finally, I'd like to
>>>> acknowledge the developer of this application.  During an email
>>>> exchange, he acknowledged that the app could do with some work, and
>>>> also succinctly explained the issues with the NSStatusItem.  He has
>>>> told me that he and other developers have been on to Apple regarding
>>>> this issue, and await their response.
>>>>
>>>> 2.  Tunnelblick.  This application is very similar to Viscosity
>>>> described above.  However, it is an opensource project, and as such
>>>> the source code is available.  Once again, the installation process
>>>> is
>>>> no problem.  However, the same issues regarding NSStatusItems  
>>>> emerge;
>>>> that is, it creates one which cannot be reached using VO.  A little
>>>> digging on the TunnelBlick wiki produced documentation on the
>>>> preferences, which can be found in a ".plist" file located in "~/
>>>> library/preferences".  Editing this file in the normal way, (using
>>>> some educated guesswork) I could actually configure the application
>>>> to
>>>> both start wen I logged on, and also to automatically connect to the
>>>> VPN thereby negating the need to go near the inaccessible status
>>>> menu.
>>>>
>>>> Finally on this application, while it does not, to the best of my
>>>> knowledge support applescript,  it does come with a command-line
>>>> interface called openvpnstart.  One has to drill down into the
>>>> application package (using terminal) to run this app.  Also, root
>>>> privileges seem to be required to run it.  However, this can be
>>>> scripted using the usual shell-scripts and this approach also works
>>>> quite well.
>>>>
>>>> So in summary, the two clients I've looked at are inaccessible in  
>>>> one
>>>> sense, but are in fact usable with a little tweaking and
>>>> experimentation.
>>>>
>>>> I hope this helps people, and might just save some time for others  
>>>> in
>>>> the future.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Donal
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>
>>>       
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.115/2404 - Release Date: 09/30/09 
> 18:56:00
>
> >   

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to