Ah ha, that's a good idea.  :)
On Oct 17, 2009, at 10:44 PM, Portia wrote:

>
> You could try hiding offline contacts so as to be able to distinguish
> who is online, and the when you want to see them again, just unhide
> them. It's not the best solution but it's something to try, <Smiles.
>
> Hth,
>
> Portia.
>
> Christina wrote:
>> Thanks.  Yeah, I can't seem to get the labels to "stick".  I've
>> labeled them several times and they still don't want to stay.  Oh
>> well.  Well, at least I know there seems to be no easy way to find  
>> out
>> someone's status.  I thought I was missing something. but I guess I'm
>> not.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Christina
>> On Oct 17, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Michael Busboom wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hello Christina,
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, there does not seem to be an easy way to determine
>>> the status
>>> of your contacts.
>>>
>>> As far as the labeling of buttons goes, I have had the same
>>> experience, i.e.
>>> I have had to relabel them a second time.
>>>
>>> Sorry for not being more helpful and best regards,
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected]
>>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christina
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 14 October, 2009 23:06
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: skype and voiceover
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone.  Is there a way to get vo to read the status of my
>>> contacts.  The thing I've been doing is just making the call and
>>> seeing what happens.  It would be nice to know the status of
>>> people.    One strange thing is that I have labeled some buttons in
>>> skype twice because every time I go back the buttons are not labeled
>>> anymore.  It's weird.
>>>
>>> I did not know I could have VO auto read the help tags on buttons  
>>> and
>>> such.  I had been using vo plus shift plus h to get vo to read the
>>> help tags.  Those were the buttons I was able to label.   
>>> Otherwise, I
>>> would not have known what the buttons were.  So, do I use VO utility
>>> to set VO to automatically read the help tags?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Christina
>>> On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Chantel Cuddemi wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Christian, get the new version of skype which is 2.8.722.
>>>> It's very accessible with vo.
>>>> On Oct 13, 2009, at 4:08 PM, Christina wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hello List,
>>>>>
>>>>> How accessible is Skype?  I am running version 2.7.0.330.  I  
>>>>> need to
>>>>> be able to video chat with someone in Germany.  I have had this
>>>>> version for well over a year and I know how to make a call by  
>>>>> moving
>>>>> to the table then interacting with it and then pressing return on
>>>>> the
>>>>> name of the person I want to "call".  I also labeled a couple of  
>>>>> the
>>>>> buttons on the window that opens for the call I am on.  I labeled
>>>>> the
>>>>> video button.  I've been wondering if other versions are more
>>>>> accessible.  This version has a ton of buttons and images that I
>>>>> have
>>>>> no idea what they are.  I am often afraid to upgrade when I'm used
>>>>> to
>>>>> something and then find out later that the new version isn't
>>>>> accessible.  DH told me that the newest skype is very different  
>>>>> than
>>>>> the version I am using.  One of the things I would like to be able
>>>>> to
>>>>> do is to have voiceover tell me the status of the person I want to
>>>>> call?  Is this possible?  I also cannot figure out how to use the
>>>>> chat
>>>>> portion of skype, the part where you type directly back and forth
>>>>> with
>>>>> someone.  Is that impossible with skype and voiceover.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wow, I hope my questions make sense.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks so much,
>>>>> Christina
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> >


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to