Hi! You’re probably right about that. BUt i am going to use my new mac when i got one for music production just for fun though but if i can afford a mac mini server that would be great. Are there any differences in audio hardware on the server compared to the mac mini? A mac pro is sadly out of budget unless some extreemly rich person would sponsor me *lol*. /A > 27 juli 2015 kl. 11:11 skrev Sabahattin Gucukoglu <[email protected]>: > > If you want raw performance, the 2012 quad-core twin-SSD server is still a > better bet. For reasons best known to Apple, current Mac Minis simply don’t > have a quad-core option. I think that’s a crying shame, personally, because > it makes the newer Mac Mini a great deal less suitable as a headless server. > My cynical mind says this is because Apple just wants to sell more iMac or, > for a server, more Mac Pro. Still, for your typical home uses, that’s not > really a problem. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
