Personally, it really depends on how the steps are constructed. Essential
is too strong a word, and depending on the process those being tested
might not have an inclusive door to that step, it might not be as secure,
etc.
I dare say those who have lost irreplaceable parts of their lives due to a
security violation or stolen device would feel the trouble worth it.
Speaking only for myself though I think we can answer the question with
examples of how the steps you are considering would be followed?
Just my thoughts,
Kare
On Mon, 16 May 2016, Ben J. Bloomgren wrote:
I may be a wee bit behind about this, but what do you guys think of two-step
verification? Is it essential? is it more trouble than it's worth?
Ben
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries
list.
If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if
you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or
moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself.
Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor and your owner is Cara
Quinn - you can reach Cara at caraqu...@caraquinn.com
The archives for this list can be searched at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/macvisionaries@googlegroups.com/
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
