Hi Mark,

Thanks for bringing this up - I would not have thought to do it.  I don't have 
battery issues, but it strikes me that if my phone is going to automatically 
join wifi networks without asking me, that disabling the radio is also a good 
security practice.
Cheers,
Donna
> On Jan 28, 2018, at 5:21 PM, M. Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Donna,
> 
> I appreciate your comments and your candor on this topic.  
> 
> Those iPhone x owners, with whom I personally interact, on either a daily or 
> weekly basis, definitely share your sentiment.  
> 
> You know, one thing I've gotten in the habbit of doing is to tell Siri to 
> turn off my Wi-Fi radio, whenever I leave my house.  I began doing this when 
> I first discovered that upon each new update to the OS, A T & T Wireless 
> resets its auto-joining Wi-Fi preference to on.  Now that I think about it, 
> Apple does the same thing.  
> 
> Unless this feature is manually disabled, each time you're in range of an A T 
> & T Wireless public Wi-Fi hub or inside or near and Apple Store, your phone 
> will automatically join the public Wi-Fi hub.  I was absolutely infuriated 
> upon discovering this.   Personally, I think it is a total violation of my 
> privacy rights.  
> 
> Since I live in a densely populated area of the country, virtually everywhere 
> I go has free public cellular provider Wi-Fi hotspots, including Apple.  
> 
> I mention A T & T Wireless, specifically, but all of the major wireless 
> providers do the exact same thing.  It should be noted that this auto-joining 
> feature does not respect the Do Not Automatically Join Network setting.  That 
> setting only applies to non-carrier/Apple Wi-Fi hubs.  
> 
> So, for me, it's just safer to turn off my Wi-Fi chip, altogether.   
> 
> Oh yes, I forgot, the reason why I brought this matter up is that disabling 
> Wi-Fi when out-and-about will increase the length of battery life.  
> 
> (smile)
> 
> Mark
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Donna Goodin
> Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2018 11:36 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: iPhone X: 5 things in Apple's best phone that drive us crazy, 
> CNET
> 
> I completely agree about Face ID, and the absence of the home button.  If I 
> had it to do over, I probably would have gone with an iPhone 8, precisely for 
> the home button and touch ID.  Both are faster than FACE ID and the new 
> gestures.  The author is right, the new gestures do pretty much become second 
> nature.  But, they aren't as fast as just touching the Home Button.  And 
> frankly, Face ID is a pain in the ***.  It often doesn't work when I need it 
> to, and if it fails, you are probably better off just entering your password 
> than turning your phone off and on again.  I don't know how apple can fix 
> these issues.  But I have to say, given half a chance, I'd go back to Touch 
> ID in a heartbeat!
> Cheers,
> Donna
>> On Jan 28, 2018, at 1:14 PM, M. Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> iPhone X: Five things that drive me absolutely nuts
>> 
>> There's a lot to like, but Apple needs to rethink some things for 
>> 2018's iPhones.
>> January 28, 2018 4:00 AM PST
>> By Sarah Tew, CNET
>> 
>> For well over two months, my days have ended and begun with the iPhone X.
>> Compared to older iPhones, the X feels impressively fast, slim and, 
>> with 5.8 inches of screen space, satisfyingly spacious. But as I've 
>> grown to appreciate some of its finer points, I've also discovered the 
>> traits that make me roll my eyes, gnash my teeth and occasionally 
>> erupt with a well-chosen expletive.
>> 
>> The funny thing is that almost all of these ire-inducing "quirks" stem 
>> from Apple's redesign of the iPhone X, which removed the home button 
>> and installed a bunch of swipes and taps to cover all navigation bases.
>> On one hand, Face ID and gestures prove that iPhone users can live 
>> without a home button. On the other, learning the ropes takes time, 
>> and the swipey stand-ins don't always make a lot of sense. Some iPhone 
>> X gestures feel half-baked.
>> 
>> So here we go, my five personal worst iPhone X navigation offenders. 
>> Stay tuned for a future piece on some of the things I truly do love 
>> about the iPhone X.
>> 
>> Face ID never works when I most need it Face ID, Apple's replacement 
>> for the secure fingerprint reader, uses the iPhone X's front-facing 
>> camera to approve mobile purchases and unlock the phone.
>> It works by making a 3D map of your eyes, nose and mouth -- except 
>> when it doesn't. Face ID recognizes me often, but fails enough times 
>> to make me notice. For example, I have about a 50-50 success rate 
>> while wearing my polarized sunglasses.
>> 
>> Face ID doesn't work when your face is stuffed in a pillow.
>> When it doesn't work is when I want it to most: as soon as I wake up 
>> in the morning. Part of the problem is biological. I'm near-sighted, 
>> which means that when I first reach for the phone while my glasses and 
>> contacts are resting in their cases, I wind up holding the phone 
>> closer to my face than the 25 to 50 centimeters that Apple recommends.
>> And then there's the fact that in my groggy morning state, I'm lying 
>> on my side with either one eye closed, or my face buried in my pillow.
>> There's no way Face ID is boring its way through that, and it's not 
>> Apple's fault.
>> What is Apple's fault is that the iPhone X doesn't have a satisfying 
>> backup plan to my morning squinty-eye. With Face ID, you don't get an 
>> immediate second chance to biometrically unlock the phone, not the way 
>> you do when the fingerprint scanner on a home button fails; you just tap it 
>> again.
>> No such luck here. You can wait some long seconds only to have to try 
>> again, or lock and unlock the phone to kickstart a new Face ID scan.
>> More often than not, I wind up typing in my 6-digit password, which is 
>> faster than waiting for Face ID to maybe or maybe not unlock. This 
>> gets annoying when you do it multiple times a day, every day. I'd love 
>> a biometric backup, or a faster do-over time if Face ID misses the 
>> scan the first time around.
>> 
>> Bleh battery life
>> If you're switching from an older iPhone with battery life that can 
>> barely hobble through a single day (especially if Apple did this), the 
>> iPhone X is a fantastic upgrade. At least at first.
>> 
>> The iPhone X will last longer than your old iPhone, but not as long as 
>> a
>> $1,000 handset should.
>> After two months, I noticed a steep battery decline. Of course your 
>> charge will take a hit every time you stream music or video, or use 
>> navigation.
>> That's life with a phone. But even on days when I didn't engage these 
>> things, I found myself topping up the power reserves before going out 
>> for the night, unconvinced my phone would make it through the evening 
>> activities.
>> When you live on your phone -- texting, looking up stuff online, 
>> reading e-books -- that uncertainty makes the difference between a 
>> device you can trust and one you have to constantly manage.
>> This isn't just anecdotal, either. In CNET's looping-video tests, the 
>> iPhone X lasted just shy of 11.5 hours average after 9 tests. That's 
>> two hours less than the iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus results with the 
>> same test, and six hours less than the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 (17.5 hours).
>> 
>> Anecdotally, it lasts longer than the iPhone 8 in real-life use, but 
>> peters out before the 8 Plus loses steam.
>> 
>> These time windows don't seem so short in a vacuum, but when you 
>> compare the results across the board, the iPhone X -- the most 
>> expensive mainstream phone you can buy -- drains as quickly as some 
>> midrange phones that cost less than half the price, if not faster.
>> 
>> To make matters more frustrating, Apple hides the iPhone X battery 
>> percentage meter; it isn't visible at a glance. Instead, you have to 
>> swipe down from the top of the phone on the right side of the notch to 
>> call up the Control Center. Only then can you keep a detailed tab on 
>> how much juice you have left.
>> 
>> Maps navigation shortcut only goes one way Tap this to get back to 
>> your ongoing Google Maps navigation.
>> I use maps navigation quite a lot. When you pop out of either Google 
>> Maps or Apple Maps to do something else, the iPhone X helpfully puts a 
>> tiny blue Tic Tac around the clock, turning it into a nifty little 
>> button you can tap to pop back into the map again.
>> This is great, but Apple stops short. See, you can toggle from any app 
>> back into the map, but you can't toggle from the map back to what you 
>> were doing before. So if you're reading an article, you can pop into 
>> the map to check on the directions (using the shortcut) but won't be 
>> able to return to the story (no shortcut).
>> When you get used to pressing that shortcut button a couple dozen 
>> times during a long trip, you'll be cursing Apple that it only goes one way.
>> Hopefully a future version of the software will make toggling a 
>> two-way street.
>> By the way, the shortcut also works with the phone app (the button 
>> turns green), voice memos (red) and some third-party apps.
>> 
>> Is the alarm on or what? 
>> I'm an inveterate nervous-alarm-setter, even on weekends. I just can't 
>> relax unless I know I won't oversleep (yes, I have problems).
>> That doesn't stop me from waking up bleary-eyed in the middle of the 
>> night second-guessing if I set the alarm for the right time, or even 
>> set it at all. I would like to be able to glance at the iPhone X and 
>> immediately see the alarm clock icon reassure me, before drifting back to 
>> sleep.
>> This is how it was pre-iPhone X and still is on the iPhone 8 and 8 
>> Plus. Yet for some reason, Apple has decided to bury this information. 
>> You can still see it -- and your remaining battery percentage -- but 
>> you have to pull down the Control Center first.
>> I don't want to mess with my phone at 4am. I don't want to swipe a 
>> screen or use more brain cells than I have to. In short, I don't want 
>> to do anything that could wake me up and make falling back asleep 
>> harder than it needs to be.
>> 
>> But the biggest problem is. 
>> iPhone X in photos
>> The first iPhone was so beloved because -- in a world of hard-to-use 
>> phones that acted like mini computers with file systems, keyboards and 
>> styluses -- it was simple. Anyone could pick it up and figure it out.
>> 10 years on, you can't use the iPhone X without a tutorial, which 
>> Apple does provide. Things that should be easy are complex. For 
>> example, don't you swipe the camera icon to open it from the lock 
>> screen? No, you hard-press and then release it. Why not simply add the 
>> option for both?
>> 
>> Ten years on, the iPhone X is rife with hidden gestures you just have 
>> to know, including powering down the phone.
>> Apple's also changed the buttons you press to take a screenshot and 
>> power down the phone. If you mess this up, you might find yourself 
>> accidentally calling 911.
>> You have to know which side of the Notch to swipe for the 
>> quick-controls in Control Center (the right side) and which to swipe 
>> for your notifications (the left). And now, you double-press the lock 
>> button to finish installing an app and hold it down to fire up Siri.
>> While these changes are absolutely learnable, and even become 
>> second-nature over time, the iPhone X's navigability is a far cry from 
>> the logical layout that made the iPhone stand out from every other phone of 
>> its day.
>> It's not that I wish the iPhone X reverted to the stripped-down style 
>> of the original iPhone. It's that Apple, in paving the way with some 
>> new technologies, had the opportunity to rethink how we use a phone, 
>> and wound up making it more complicated to use -- not less.
>> 
>> Original Article at:
>> https://www.cnet.com/news/iphone-x-worst-features/#ftag=CAD-09-10aai5b
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> The following information is important for all members of the Mac 
>> Visionaries list.
>> 
>> If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if 
>> you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or 
>> moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself.
>> 
>> Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor.  You can reach 
>> mark at:  [email protected] and your owner is 
>> Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at [email protected]
>> 
>> The archives for this list can be searched at:
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> --
> The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries 
> list.
> 
> If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if 
> you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or 
> moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself.
> 
> Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor.  You can reach mark at:  
> [email protected] and your owner is Cara Quinn - you 
> can reach Cara at [email protected]
> 
> The archives for this list can be searched at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> 
> -- 
> The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries 
> list.
> 
> If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if 
> you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or 
> moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself.
> 
> Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor.  You can reach mark at:  
> [email protected] and your owner is Cara Quinn - you 
> can reach Cara at [email protected]
> 
> The archives for this list can be searched at:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries 
list.

If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you 
feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or 
moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself.

Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor.  You can reach mark at:  
[email protected] and your owner is Cara Quinn - you 
can reach Cara at [email protected]

The archives for this list can be searched at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to