Well that's what you otta call trust in your staff. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] <[email protected]> On Behalf Of M. Taylor Sent: Sunday, 16 February 2020 1:32 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Comment: Apple is wrong in the staff bag search case, and should fix it today, 9 to 5 Mac
Comment: Apple is wrong in the staff bag search case, and should fix it today, 9 to 5 Mac Friday, February 14, 2020 We learned yesterday that the California Supreme Court ruled against Apple in a bag search case: deciding whether or not the company has to pay retail workers for the time spent for their bags to be checked at the end of their shifts. Staff had complained that they not only had to remain in the store for the time taken by the search itself but could be waiting around up to 45 minutes in the queue for the search - all of which time was unpaid. This case dates back to 2013, with another case predating this class action suit, and the thing I really can't believe is that Apple has been fighting it for almost seven years. It seems self-evident that Apple is in the wrong here. Indeed, back in 2015 CEO Tim Cook seemed to have trouble believing it was even happening. Papers from a failed class action suit by Apple Store staff reveal that at least two retail employees complained directly to CEO Tim Cook about the policy of subjecting them to anti-theft bag checks before they left the store. Tim Cook forwarded the complaints to senior retail and HR executives, asking "Is this true?". The company's VP of human resources said at the time that 'there has to be a more intelligent and respectful' approach than expecting staff to submit to searches in their own time. As the court has now correctly ruled, if a company requires an employee to remain on its premises for any reason, then that time is by definition company time and not personal time. Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye explained that Apple employees "are clearly under Apple's control while awaiting, and during, the exit searches." "The exit searches burden Apple's employees by preventing them from leaving the premises with their personal belongings until they undergo an exit search-a process that can take five to 20 minutes to complete-and by compelling them to take specific movements and actions during the search," the unanimous court said. Now, I can understand how the policy may have arisen in the first place. It might seem on paper that a search would take 30 seconds after they clock off. But, equally, it must have become very quickly apparent to store managers that the time taken is in practice far longer than this. That information should have been communicated up the chain, and the policy should have been changed in response. Even if we forgive the inevitable bureaucracy of a large organization not realizing at a senior level what was happening on the ground, the first lawsuit should absolutely have prompted an investigation - and that investigation should have resulted in a rapid change of policy. It defies belief that Apple would not only fail to act on the first bag search case, but to have been fighting this one all the way. Especially as anecdotal evidence suggests that it hasn't actually carried out the searches for years now. This isn't a company wide practice. I worked there for 5 years and never had my bag checked once. Even with access to BOH - Benedict Bandersnatch (@_oscg) February 14, 2020 Cook should immediately accept the ruling, apologize to staff and announce that Apple will issue back-pay to all staff for the time spent on searches. Of course, it won't be realistic to calculate that individually for each member of staff, but an average should be taken and staff paid on that basis. The bag search case has now become a major PR problem for the company. When that happens, a rapid response is key. I think Cook's announcement should happen today. Original Article at: https://9to5mac.com/2020/02/14/bag-search-case/ -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor. You can reach mark at: [email protected] and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at [email protected] The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/macvisionaries/000301d5e460%248ec387f0%24ac4a97d0%24%40edu. -- The following information is important for all members of the Mac Visionaries list. If you have any questions or concerns about the running of this list, or if you feel that a member's post is inappropriate, please contact the owners or moderators directly rather than posting on the list itself. Your Mac Visionaries list moderator is Mark Taylor. You can reach mark at: [email protected] and your owner is Cara Quinn - you can reach Cara at [email protected] The archives for this list can be searched at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/macvisionaries/ME1PR01MB1538D51B7B31A4F5A2B3DA858A160%40ME1PR01MB1538.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com.
