I think it is over priced as well. I can buy a netbook with far greater 
storage capacity for far less, and even if I buy System Access, I'll have a 
lower price, and I am not limited to the Software big brother Apple wants me 
to have.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Robert Carter" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:56 PM
Subject: Re: Used an iPad today


Hi,

I am surprised that you feel that the iPad is over priced. It seems to me 
that Apple has really made a place for themselves in the lower priced 
devices with the introduction of the iPad. I personally think the price is 
impressive.

Robert Carter


On Apr 6, 2010, at 2:23 PM, Cody wrote:

> I think the idea is awesome in terms of accessibility and apple will 
> certainly get praises for that which they deserve, however I think the 
> product itself is a rip off. sure, it's $499, but then they plan to rape 
> you at the app counter, so yeah it's accessible alright, but is it worth a 
> place in your walet? We sometimes let accessibility over power our budgets 
> because we see something and think, wow, gotta have that one.
>
> Cody
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bryan Smart" 
> <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 2:59 PM
> Subject: Used an iPad today
>
>
> I'd ordered the 3G model, so will be waiting a few more weeks yet, but I 
> had some time to play with a WiFi model today.
>
> Generally, it's an iPhone. However, besides the screen size being 
> increased, the interface has increased in complexity, also. Apple is 
> certainly using the extra space to expand on what is possible with an 
> iPhone type touch interface.
>
> It took me only very little time to discover that portrait mode (which 
> lots of sighted users select), is probably not the best for a blind 
> person. When you're working with two hands, having more horizontal room 
> seems to make more of a difference when navigating. Fortunately, it is a 
> snap to try either way to see what works for you.
>
> I absolutely agree with the posters that were talking about the horrible 
> oversight about the back plate of the iPad. It is almost nothing but shiny 
> aluminum. You're supposed to be able to set the iPad on a table to use it, 
> but I promise, the first time that you place it on any table that isn't 
> absolutely clear of small dirt particles, you'll pic it up to discover 
> that the slight motion of you pushing and sliding the iPad has ground the 
> dirt particles in to the back, and scratched the hell out of your shiny 
> aluminum back plate. Of course, you can buy the case to fix that. the case 
> is a type of thin and stiff coated particle board that feels a lot like a 
> traditional print notebook. One side snugly holds the iPad, and the other 
> side is a flap that covers the iPad screen when closed. I suppose that 
> most people will want the case to protect the screen when traveling, 
> anyway. If you go without the case, though, you are absolutely asking for 
> it. Apple could have put something on the back to make the iPad more 
> stable. Maybe not rubber feet, but they could have gone with a felt square 
> in the center, a stylized strip of some high friction material, etc. The 
> curved back will insure that the iPad wobbles on the table, and the glossy 
> case will absolutely scratch.
>
> VoiceOver sounded about the same, and responded with the same speed, 
> pretty much. The speaker was very clear. Didn't get to play music with it, 
> but I hear the bass is poor. Still, speech is pretty good through the 
> built-in speakers.
>
> However, it seemed to me that iPad programs opened more slowly than on the 
> iPhone. Maybe there is more information to load? However, with more memory 
> and a faster processor, I wasn't expecting that.
>
> I wasn't dramatically blown away by the applications that were available 
> on it, but working with a big talking touch screen interface started me 
> dreaming about things that *could* be accomplished with a device like 
> that. Many people might not need the iPad for web surfing or checking 
> e-mail, but I think that, eventually, there will be some very unique uses 
> for the iPad.
>
> Bryan
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to