That's how I config my router at home. it is password protected so I jut log in to the website config but yeah it sucks that the newer models, some of them require a captcha. Don't ask me why though. lol! On Sep 8, 2010, at 6:59 AM, erik burggraaf wrote:
> Hi, that wasn't true of the last wrt104N that my clients are using. It > wouldn't really make much sense to do that, since the only person who can get > in to the web IF is some one who is already authorized to use the router as > an internet connection, unless you are silly enough to provide open access to > the remote access feature, but who would really be that silly? It's a bit > out of the way. > > Best, > > Erik Burggraaf > Check out my first ever podcast tutorial, Learn braille using the braille box. > Visit http://www.erik-burggraaf.com and click podcasts to read more and > subscribe. > > On 2010-09-07, at 11:22 PM, Sarah Alawami wrote: > >> I think the new linksys routers require a captcha though to access there >> firmware, so I hear from someone who is versed in these things. >> On Sep 7, 2010, at 7:26 PM, Christy Schulte wrote: >> >>> If you're not using a 2wire modem from verizon already, I definitely >>> suggest going the linksys route. Netgear is horrid, at least when I tried >>> it. >>> >>> That said I've been using this 2wire for a while and it's been a long time >>> since I fiddled with a linksys router. But when I did, it was completely >>> accessible all the way, at least under windows. >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Arrigo" <[email protected]> >>> To: <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 8:53 PM >>> Subject: routers >>> >>> >>> Hi all, well, I might be looking at getting a new router, mine has started >>> having some strange problems, so it may be going bad, was wondering which >>> routers are the most accessible with their web interfaces. I know the >>> linksys routers work well, what about net geer, belkin or d-link? I've >>> heard some routers use a capcha now to get in to their configurations, that >>> is nuts. >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "MacVisionaries" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >>> Version: 8.5.441 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3119 - Release Date: 09/07/10 >>> 06:34:00 >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "MacVisionaries" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacVisionaries" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
