they offered a canned response. iOS is not OS X. its a different code base and the Desktop Manager and some of the apps "look and feel" like those on OS X proper. from the response, it looks like they ignored OS X accessibility entirely.
-Eric On Feb 11, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Maccessibility wrote: > Twitterific Developers Respond to Comments on Lack of Accessibility in Version > 4.0 for OS X > > Earlier today, we reported on the lack of accessibility in Twitterific for Mac > in its most recent version, noting that it was a significant step backward > from > the previous version in this regard. > Responding to a VoiceOver user on its Twitter account, the developers have > stated: > We took great pains to make it work properly in iOS [...] > > You can read the rest of this news item at: > http://www.lioncourt.com/2011/02/11/twitterific-developers-respond-to-comments-on-lack-of-accessibility-in-version-4-0-for-os-x/ > > The Mac-cessibility Network > "...it's all within our reach..." > http://maccessibility.net > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
