Quite correct.  IF you ask me, this is getting just plain f.  IF the intention 
is to encourage us to visit the site for the story, why not just post the 
blasted link and be done with it for goodness sake.  I'm also growing very 
weary of this infantile  stupid practice of making us go to the site when all 
that's left of an article is perhaps one or two words.  ENOUGH, ENOUGH, 
ENOUGH!!!!

Sincerely, 
The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!

Now A Very Proud and very happy Mac user!!!

Skype Name:
barefootedray

On Feb 14, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Chris Moore wrote:

> I must admit, I totally agree with this.  What is the point in directing us 
> to only read a few extra words?  This seems to happen with the majority of 
> these postings.  Why not just paste the entire article in here?               
>  
> On 14 Feb 2011, at 09:51, Søren Jensen wrote:
> 
>> I'm tired of reading 95% of the news and then click the link to open the 
>> website to read the last 10 words. I don't know if this is the limit of the 
>> blogging system, but I don't have time . to open up a website just to read 
>> the whole news when receiving more than 200 mails each day. 
>> Best regards:
>> Søren Jensen
>> mail & MSN:
>> [email protected]
>> Website:
>> http://www.coolfortheblind.dk/
>> 
>> Den 11/02/2011 kl. 21.00 skrev Maccessibility:
>> 
>>> Twitterific for Mac 4.0 Is Released Sans VoiceOver Accessibility
>>> 
>>> The IconFactory has released the much anticipated Twitterific 4.0 for Mac 
>>> OS X.
>>> Though Twitterific was one of the first OS X Twitter clients to incorporate
>>> accessibility, the application has taken a huge step backward with this 
>>> release.
>>> The message timelines are not exposed to VoiceOver, making the app unusable.
>>> Interestingly, much of the app elsewhere [...]
>>> 
>>> You can read the rest of this news item at:
>>> http://www.lioncourt.com/2011/02/11/twitterific-for-mac-4-0-is-released-sans-voiceover-accessibility/
>>> 
>>> The Mac-cessibility Network
>>> "...it's all within our reach..."
>>> http://maccessibility.net
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to