Yeah the article really didn't consern me. I just thorugh it was an interesting read lol! Well let's hope apple takes note and updates there next mac book in about 2 years. Hehahaha! I'm still happy with mine and will run it in to the ground. On Mar 1, 2011, at 2:20 AM, Scott Howell wrote:
> The question that should be asked is how many machines did they tear down. > Out of the overall number of machines produced/assembled, how many have > quality issues. The statements made are somewhat ridiculous because price > point has nothing to do with it. YOu could purchase a $100,000 car and find > sloppy work just as easily in the $20,000 car. If they did a tear down on 10 > or 20 machines I would say there is a question about quality that needs to be > addressed. Of course hopefully APple takes note and monitors perhaps the > facility where that machine originated to ensure proper quality standards are > being met. > Scott > > > > > > On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:10 PM, Sarah Alawami wrote: > >> Did apple's builders mess up? read on. >> >> http://bit.ly/gJ4H9d >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "MacVisionaries" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
