I would agree, and add that I have seen very few recognition errors on
anything that I have scanned, and some of the stuff was newsletters, and
other stuff with a lot of print in different sizes and fonts.
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Panarese" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2011 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: Docuscan scanning quality
So far, I have to say I am very impressed. In fact, I was really
pleased by what results I have been getting. I am very critical of OCR
and, thus, tend to be very selective. This, to me, is a very accurate
piece of software.
Take Care
John D. Panarese
Director
Mac for the Blind
[email protected]
http://www.macfortheblind.com
AUTHORIZED APPLE STORE BUSINESS AFFILIATE
MAC VOICEOVER TRAINING AND SUPPORT
On Apr 30, 2011, at 11:10 AM, Sarai Bucciarelli wrote:
Hello:
For those using this program, how is the quality of the text when
scanned? Kurzweil does a good job with tables, for example. What about
docuscan?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
