hello, Lets put it this way: nightly builds are where company test their stuff. every new little thing they do is implemented in nightly builds. if it succeeds, then a lot of nightly builds become the next release. if not, it's taken off. this is a short version of the technical concept but it gives you the idea. I see no problem with trying nightly builds so long as you know they can break.
thanks mauricio On Oct 12, 2012, at 3:34 AM, Teresa Cochran <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, all, > > I currently have the nightly build of Firefox. How does it compare with the > most current official release? Is the official release more stable? I realize > both may not be entirely responsive with VO, but is one more stable in > general terms than the other? If someone's used both, can you tell me how > they compare? Do you think it would be advisable to continue monitoring the > nightly build for more accessibility developments? > > Thanks, > teresa > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
