No question here, fusion is the way to go. Parallels is completely
inaccessible. People have been asking them to fix that for years, and
they have no interest in doing so. Go with fusion.
Original message:
My Girlfriend has a macbook pro that she is willing to let me use as a
secondary machine to learn more about OSX and iphone programming. I'd
like to do this in a virtual machine running OSX to insure complete
isolation just in case I were to fat finger a terminal command or do
something else stupid that would mess something up system wide instead
of just effecting a single user account on the machine. Since I need
both basic voiceover support for the virtual machine software as well
as full voiceover support in the guest which is the better option,
Fusion or Parallels and why? Note Windows won't be run as a virtual
machine so I'm not worried about Windows screen reader support in the vm.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/macvisionaries/-/3lW1CwJ6nYwJ
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/macvisionaries/-/3lW1CwJ6nYwJ>.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
