In a broader sense, Firefox's main advantage is the huge ecosphere of
plugins. Safari supports plugins but either Apple hasn't promoted it or
there are some other hurdles which has made the plugin selection weak.
Hope the VO accessibility in Firefox will extend to the plugins as well.
Only one way to find out :)
CB
On 2/26/13 7:54 AM, Phil Halton wrote:
I think firefox's primary advantage would be in the ability to use the
Webvisum captcha solving plugin.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicholas Parsons"
<[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 5:40 AM
Subject: Re: Firefox: Oh wow! it actually? works!
I agree it's great news that we now have more choices. However, I'm
curious, does it do anything that Safari cannot or work with VoiceOver
better than Safari does? I'd happily take a more accessible, though
slightly slower, browser. I don't find Safari on my Macs particularly
slow. It might be worth using FireFox just for WebVisum though.
--
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
