Thanks everyone for the replies. It looks like camera solution is not accurate enough. The flatbed (if you can't take book apart) and scanner with ADF seem to be the best.

JL

On 9/29/2013 5:47 PM, Annie Skov Nielsen wrote:
Hi.

I have tried the hovercam. If mine was broken I do not know, but I get very bad 
results, and had a lot of problems with software. I am getting better results 
with my phone and standscan, but still a flatbed scanner would be preferable, 
but it has become more difficult to get a good flatbed scanner.

Best regards Annie.
Den Sep 29, 2013 kl. 3:52 PM skrev Steve Holmes <[email protected]>:

I haven't tried the hover cam on the Mac but back when I was trying to use it 
on my Windows laptop with Docuscan plus, I got horrible results. I went out and 
bought a flat bed scanner; much better results with that. The scanner with 
Docuscan works great on the Mac too. I just don't have any faith in these 
camera based approaches.

On Sep 25, 2013, at 4:57 AM, erik burggraaf <[email protected]> wrote:

This solution meets the requirement of being the fastest, but it falls over in 
a few ways.

first, a double sided sheet feeder is an expensive proposition, even though you 
can probably find a voscan compatible one.  If you're in a commercial setting 
such as a university transcription service you might be able to justify the 
cost, but for an individual it doesn't really make that much sense.

Second, you have to cut the books.  The books themselves can be quite 
expensive.  I preferred to double up with my classmates when I was in college.  
I scanned some one else's book pertimes because the books costed between 70 and 
150 dollars a piece.  You may want to resell the books and get some of your 
money back later.  Again, if you're a professional transcription service this 
might be a good bet, but for an individual it's not really the way to go.

Third, While there are good tutorials on making the whole 
voscan/readiris/finereader system work done by knowledgeable people in plain 
language, the fact of the matter is, setting up the duel software system 
initially takes a bit of extra overhead.  I've never been much tempted myself.  
$200 to get two pieces of software and merry them together is reasonable enough 
on cost, but I know that most of my clients are not happy with the idea of two 
programs to do one job.

I like the camera system myself.  I'm not a professional transcription service, 
so the idea of taking half an hour to scan a book that used to take me three 
hours really doesn't faze me.  The camera is portable so I can take it on the 
road if I want.  I can also fold it out of the way to save desk space if I need 
to.  I use an eyepal, because I had access to funding and because I got a 
corporate discount on it through my access technology company.  I haven't had 
great experiences with it under windows, but on the mac it seems to work really 
well despite not being designed well at all from a software standpoint.  I also 
have a hovercam T5V.  While I mostly use it under windows with k1000, it can 
also be used with docuscan plus on the mac.  Docuscan is cloud based and I'm 
not very happy with that aspect of it, but I like the hovercam hardware better 
than the EyePal.  It feels sturdier and it's cheeper.  Not to mention the 
docuscan software is actually built for mac as opposed to the jury-rigged 
eyepal approach.  Out of pocket, docuscan and the hovercam are cheeper than the 
eyepal.  If your alternative is an industrial grade double-sided sheet feeding 
scanner, then docuscan and a hovercam are going to be cheeper than that as 
well.  If you don't mind splicing sets of pages together and you buy a consumer 
grade single sided sheet feeder, you could get one for a reasonable price.  I 
don't think it would be as fast as a camera, but it would be less maintenance 
because you wouldn't have to flip pages manually.

Hope this helps,

Erik Burggraaf
Follow my series of articles about setting up a small business through the 
ontario disability support program at http://www.erik-burggraaf.com/blog
Ebony Consulting toll-free: 1-888-255-5194
or on the web at http://www.erik-burggraaf.com

On 2013-09-24, at 1:55 PM, Anne Robertson <[email protected]> wrote:

Hello James,

If you can take the books apart, you'd be fastest with the kind of scanner that 
will scan both sides of a sheet and also has an automatic feed. The application 
VueScan can probably handle one of these and it produces very good images.

However, VueScan is not good for OCR. It will do it, but not very well. You 
can, however, feed the file of images to ABBYY FineReader Express for Mac which 
does an excellent job on OCR.

Here is a link to the page showing which scanners are supported by VueScan:
<http://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/vuescan.htm#supported>

Cheers,

Anne


On 24 Sep 2013, at 15:41, James Lee <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi All,

I'm wondering what would be the fastest way for a college student to scan books 
with accurate OCR?
I know there are cameras out there for scanning documents like hover cam and 
pearl, but I haven't actually used them.
I could be wrong, but pearl is only works with Open Book, right?
Can someone share their experience, and recommend what to buy?
Especially comparison would be very helpful.
Thanks so much,

JL

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to