I have always thought it was OK to upgrade to Mavricks. I can tell you that it's not necessary at all to upgrade VMware Fusion. I didn't and it's just fine without doing so.
On Feb 28, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Phil Halton <[email protected]> wrote: > With the latest updates to Mavericks, has it become a net gain to upgrade > from ML, or are they on parity still? > ML works great for me with my fusion VM of window7. I don't want to upgrade > and screw things up including my MacMail/Gmail setup , and also have to > upgrade fusion if there's not a net gain in features/productivity etc. > > I have ML superDuper'd and I believe I go install Mavericks and swap back and > forth from ML, having both OSX versions available to me. I am a little leary > about what I might have to do for windows VM - perhaps having to upgrade > fusion. > What do you all think? is it worth the hassle to go to Mavericks? > I usually don't like to get too far behind the curve with new OS versions, > but ML works fine and I believe Mavericks is still trying to stabilize from > its initial shaky roll out. > Thanks for your thoughts on this question. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "MacVisionaries" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MacVisionaries" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
