#441: duplicate node list entries in ad-hoc mode
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
      Reporter:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]        |       Owner:                        
              
          Type:  defect                 |      Status:  new                     
            
      Priority:  major                  |   Milestone:  version 0.9.0 - move to 
new codebase
     Component:  madwifi: 802.11 stack  |     Version:  trunk                   
            
    Resolution:                         |    Keywords:  adhoc duplicate node    
            
Patch_attached:  0                      |  
----------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Changes (by Vikram):

  * patch_attached:  1 => 0

Comment:

 Impact of this on the [http://madwifi.org/ticket/334] ticket

 Good News ! Maybe !

 My setup had three ad-hoc nodes (s1, s2 and r). 'r' is the receiver
 running two netserver intances. 's1' and 's2' ran netperf (UDP_STREAM) to
 the netservers on 'r'.

 If 'r' somehow has duplicate entries for 's1', then the traffic coming
 into 'r' from 's1' causes heavy memory leaks. NOTE that if in this
 situation 's2' sends traffic to 'r', that does NOT cause any problems.
 Sometimes the duplicate entry does not happen, I am not sure why. But when
 they do, it is virtually assured that the memory increase will cause a
 panic in the kernel.

 I downloaded the r1457+above patch and did the above experiment again. The
 duplicate entries did not occur, and hence the massive leaks leading to
 panic did not happen. There was still some relatively minor leak, I am not
 sure what the source of that is. But that one existed in r1454 as well.
 Probably nothing to do with madwifi, but I am not sure.

 I think someone else should test the r1457-along-with-the-patch using
 iperf or netperf and see if [http://madwifi.org/ticket/334] ticket can be
 deemed partially closed !

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://madwifi.org/ticket/441>
MadWifi <http://madwifi.org/>
Multiband Atheros Driver for Wireless Fidelity

Reply via email to