Although I /like/ it, I don't *love* it. It's simple and
professional,
but not bold or inspiring.
Maybe. I'm pretty inspired by the "ae" image that was created... it
feels organic and flows well and it would make a great stand-alone,
recognizable image.
I'm wondering... Should converasation based around judging logos be
moved off of the list?
T.
---
Weblog ~ http://tim.samoff.com
Kidblog ~ http://kc.samoff.com
Photography ~ http://www.flickr.com/photos/timsamoff
Film ~ http://www.youtube.com/timsamoff ----- Original Message -----
Subject: Re: RFC - logo submissions
From: Andrew Flegg
To: "Tim" ,"List for community development"
Date: 07/28/2008 2:54 pm
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Tim wrote:
> Looks like this one is in the "lead" so far:
>
> https://wiki.maemo.org/Image:Maemo.org_logo_contest_Thiercito8.jpg
Which I think shows it's good it's not a vote :-)
Although I /like/ it, I don't *love* it. It's simple and
professional,
but not bold or inspiring.
> I'm wondering... Does everyone like the size/placement of the
".org"? Is it
> within our realm to choose a winner, but ask for alteration? (I'm
not saying
> that this one needs alteration, but Iam wondering what to do about
logos
> that are good, but not quite perfect.)
The trouble is, if artist's were responding to every comment on here
that could lead to chaos. I'd hope the judges would feel empowered
enough to say, privately perhaps, to a candidate "we *really* like
this one, but would changes a, b and c compromise your design?"
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.bleb.org/
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
