I agree that Projects should receive a heavier Karma weight than
blog posts. (And you guys can figure out the math for IRC and
everything else). But, I also think that Karma should never go into
the negatives -- that just seems wrong to me. Couldn't Zero be the
floor?
T.
---
Weblog ~ http://tim.samoff.com
Kidblog ~ http://kc.samoff.com
Photography ~ http://www.flickr.com/photos/timsamoff
Film ~ http://www.youtube.com/timsamoff
----- Original Message -----
Subject: Re: Reforming Karm
From: Ryan Abel
To: "List for community development"
Date: 10/03/2008 4:13 am
On Oct 3, 2008, at 5:48 AM, Simon Pickering wrote:
> Although we are against limiting karma, we should perhaps have a
lower
> limit of 0. Another option would be to allow any negative karma to
> only affect the group in which it falls - i.e. if you have overall
> negative blogging karma that would fall to 0, but your discussion
> karma would remain at its usual value.
Relevant discussion here: http://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3767
I think the lower-limit of zero should apply to any particular blog
post, rather than all blog posts as a group. So a post with 1 heart
and 11 thumbs, would give 0 karma, rather than giving -10 karma and
reducing a second post with 11 hearts and 1 thumb to 0 karma.
--
Ryan Abel
Maemo Community Council chair
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
