Am Dienstag, den 30.09.2008, 11:04 +0100 schrieb Andrew Flegg: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hence my current proposal is to use a long (but less error-prone) > > Version and Target Milestone string like "4.1-2 (4.2008.36-5)" instead > > of current "4.1.2" (note the hyphen instead of the dot), but I wonder if > > that brings up other problems if Nokia decides to also provide flash > > images (and introduce their own versioning scheme for theme, like "4.2") > > in addition to SSU updates. > > Is it easy to rename versions? Perhaps it should be "<latest > version>+1", i.e. the next version is known, in Bugzilla, as "4.1.1+1" > until it's released; then it is renamed to the appropriate version > (say 4.1.2). The next iteration would then be "4.1.2+1".
I've been using "4.1+" for the next, not yet published update, and I'm going to keep this. Renaming isn't fun, but it's okay (less than 10 minutes). And I wanted to avoid having four levels of numbers - I already see enough average reporters mixing up 2.2.x and 2.22.x in GNOME Bugzilla so I have bad experiences the more complex it gets. I ended up with adding the exact software release name for the Diablo series to make things clear. So e.g. "4.1.2" has now become "4.1.2 (4.2008.36-5)". I think it's a good compromise. andre -- Andre Klapper (maemo.org bugmaster) _______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
