Benson wrote:
>
> So far, I think Dave, Andrew, and I have spoken out on this... anyone else
> have opinions? (I'm gonna go bump the itT thread as well...)
What about a referndum with four options, then:
1) No change; the current process is fine.
2) A single-transferrable vote system.
3) A reweighted range voting system.
4) None of the above.
The wording needs to be tightened up into concrete changes. Suggestions welcome.
Cheers,
Andrew
PS. There's another potential issue with the concept of Bayesian
regret: the assumption that a voter *can* rate their preferred
candidates both in line with their internal utility
estimations /and/ relative to each other. How do
I realistically rate the %ge I want Ryan to be on the
council vs. Simon? So, personally, I still prefer
STV; although - as Tim says - it's hardly the end of
the world.
--
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:[email protected] | http://www.bleb.org/
Maemo Community Council member
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
