ext Andrew Flegg wrote: >>> Copyright (c) 2002-2009 Nokia Corporation >> To what? :)
What about a footer inspired by the one at http://creativecommons.org ? "Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License" If there is Nokia copyrighted content under maemo.org it is the task of the related Nokia owners to state that in the relevant pages. Since the norm is not to have such type of content in maemo.org, there is no need for a mention in the home or every single page. How really relevant is to state the 2002-2008 period in any case? To start with, was it there any maemo.org on 2002? And in a project like maemo.org, what is the big interest pushing a "(c)" compared to a much more appropriate CC logo and notice? -- Quim Gil open source advocate Maemo Software @ Nokia _______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
