Thanks Dave, but it was my understanding in a previous discussion along those lines that incorporating "maemo" in site names (like maemo-guru, et al) and similar was okay.� Note that there are similar organizations/enterprises wrapped around other trademarked terms without issues.
BUT-- I will bounce this off Peter nonetheless (or maybe he's monitoring this list?). Randall (Randy) Arnold maemo.org community council http://tabulacrypticum.wordpress.com/ > ----- Original message ----- > From: "Dave Neary" <[email protected]> > To: "List for community development" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: A business case for Maemo > Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:26:21 +0200 > > > Hi Randall, > > Randall Arnold wrote: > > Since actions speak louder than words, I have already begun a process... > > ... > > > Thoughts? > > I don't want to put a dampener on a nice idea, but... > > ...don't forget that Maemo is a Nokia trademark, and using it for > professional purposes is likely to cause a problem for someone at some > stage. Much better to do like Mer and simply choose something related > but different. > > Cheers, > Dave. > > -- > maemo.org docsmaster > Email: [email protected] > Jabber: [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-community mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community > -------------------------------------------------------------- Ovi Mail: Making email access easy http://mail.ovi.com
_______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
