Hi, On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Dave Neary <dne...@maemo.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > Valerio Valerio wrote: > > We need to reach a decision for this proposal[1]. > > > > "Currently it's easier to get plenty of karma blogging about apps, > > talking about apps and commenting bugs in apps... but at the end are the > > developers who carry with a lot of the hard work. Let's praise them!" - > > Quim Gil > > > > There's already some good points/solutions in the brainstorm page and in > > the related discussion at TMO[1] (Warning a lot of 'sparks' there :) ). > > > > IMO the solution with more potential so far is "#6 Measure existing > > userbase via updates"[3], of course it needs some tweaks[4][5]. > > One idea which hasn't been discussed is that we could increase > appplication development related karma, or reduce talk/blog/email > related karma, to give a bigger influence to application development. > > In general, I think that using downloads has a few merits - notably, > it's the easiest to apply, which is a concern. > > App karma is intended to measure relevance over time, so why not have it > added to maintainers karma (but then, the maintainers karma can/should > go down over time - is that OK?). > > I see that Quim's already asked those questions in that Talk thread. > > It seems to me like measuring the peak height is a bit trickier, and has > the same problem that the karma from the app can go up or down over time. > The idea is keep the highest peak all the time, so the karma never goes down. Best regards, -- Valério Valério http://www.valeriovalerio.org > Cheers, > Dave. > > -- > maemo.org docsmaster > Email: dne...@maemo.org > Jabber: bo...@jabber.org > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-community mailing list > maemo-community@maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community >
_______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list maemo-community@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
