On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 19:13, Carsten Munk <carsten.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Agreed, but the time for nominations is kinda over so it's a part of > an on-going election which changes things a bit - the nomination > likely shouldn't have been in the ballot in the first place.
IIRC, the intent of the clause was pretty much for this situation, although perhaps the use of the word "nomination" is sloppy and ambiguous. Of course, *technically* the wording is all we can go off :-) If Robin's name on the ballot doesn't fall under this clause, the consequences are undefined. In that case, I'm still not sure I'm convinced with Dave acting without consultation. Cheers, Andrew -- Andrew Flegg -- mailto:and...@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/ Maemo Community Council chair _______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list maemo-community@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
