On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Ville M. Vainio <vivai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Extras would only be broken for the apps that use the -experimental > libs, if there is a fumbled release. So, it's a "life they have > What I was trying to say is that there is a good chance every release will be fumbled with the current process :) as it is really not meant for heavily interdependent multipackage projects (as seen from some Python binding growing pains). > chosen". I'd expect the releases in -experimental to be rather > mechanical merges instead of proper quality assured releases. With > Yeah, but that still leaves the question of extras-testing open. Changing underlying versions of Qt in the middle of testing can break things (we really don't want t-downs on unsuspecting apps because a certain Qt build is broken), and chances are that there is sufficient overlap that there is not a moment when no package in testing is affected. Niels, any comments on the whole thing ? As I understand it, this is quite different form what/how it is happening now, but have no insight how easy/difficult it would be to implement.
_______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list maemo-community@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
