On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 07:22, Ville M. Vainio <vivai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Situation check:
>
> So, what's the role of maemo community communication channels (these
> mailing lists, talk.maemo.org) and Harmattan? Will maemo community
> embrace Harmattan as "natural continuation" after maemo5? Or should
> these channels be relegated to maemo5 and older alone, moving
> Harmattan discussion elsewhere?
Facts:
* Harmattan will be using deb packaging, rather than RPM (AFAWK)
* meego.com has explicitly ruled out being the place for
manufacturer-specific end-/power-user discussion.
Unknowns:
* Will Nokia be able to market the device as "MeeGo", as the
compliance exemption has yet to be granted.
Questions:
* Where will people be getting their software? Will COBS be
producing Harmattan debs and, if so, make them available
through the meego.com equivalent of maemo.org/downloads?
In my opinion, the whole thing's a mess. Developers asking questions
about Qt will be answered on meego-*; but asking about Qt Quick
Components might be rejected as it's "not part of MeeGo" (with MeeGo
UX Components being preferred); developers probably won't be welcome
to discuss the intricacies of deb packaging for Harmattan, but will be
uploading source tarballs for Debian packaging to COBS?
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:and...@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org/
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
maemo-community@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
