---- Qole <[email protected]> wrote: 
>I really feel addressed as the primary person behind the "some people" 
>comments made here; I am being accused of wanting to shut maemo.org down, of 
>wanting to burn the maemo house down behind me, etc.

Qole, had I been talking about you I would have quoted said thread directly.  
Your thread was well after a lot of the MeeGo party had already done their 
damage.  I think, in part, your thread got the reception (perception?) is did 
was because the waters were still bloody from the debate over MeeGo.  After a 
shark attack, every wave crest looks like a fin.

>I don't believe that a referendum at this point is a good idea.

I'm also not sure a referendum the best path.  I would like to see the topic 
debated and concepts on how and when to handle the upcoming transition talked 
about by those being elected to the new council however.  I'm happy to see at 
least 2 nominees already talking about it.

>There is still a year and a half on the clock before Nokia will decide whether 
>or not to continue funding for Maemo infrastructure. The community will be 
>much different in a year

I agree the community will be different in a year.  But I don't think it's too 
early to start looking at possible solutions.  We're talking about a 
potentially large transition.  I'd rather not put off looking a it for 6 months 
to a year, only to find out that the remaining time isn't enough to do what the 
community (now or then) prefers to do.

I'm not advocating immediate action, but I don't think we should ignore it 
either, or kick it down the road for the next council.  I'd like to examine 
what options we have and how long and what support levels those options will 
take to become real.  That discussion could take time, which is the one thing 
we do have right now.

_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community

Reply via email to