Hi, On 11/08/2011 05:17 PM, robert bauer wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Ferenc Szekely <fer...@maemo.org > <mailto:fer...@maemo.org>> wrote: > > Hello, > > On 11/08/2011 03:28 PM, robert bauer wrote: > > Ferenc, > > > > Thanks for your message. If staggering the vote is not enough to > reduce > > server load, please go ahead and use a simple filter based on > karma and > > length of community membership so that the server load will be > manageable. > > > Our community has 660 people with karma >= 100. That's a lot less than > 57000. Tuning the mailing script (ie. 1 email per person) should not be > a big deal, though I have not looked that part yet. > > > The other suggestions are appreciated. While there is merit in more > > selectively reducing the email recipients to those N900 users most > > likely to have tested the submissions, or at least those who are > > currently active in the community, as indicated previously, the > priority > > now is to get the vote completed and those additional factors, even if > > possible, are likely to burden and slow the process. Of course, > if I am > > mistaken in this regard, then Ferenc can point that out. > > > I can change the mailing script if the council agrees to introduce the > karma filter. > > On behalf of Council, I authorize the karma filter. > > OK, great. All eligible people will receive 1 email with 1 token, so they can use that in all 9 votings.
I assume the Council has already agreed on the content of the email (aka instructions) that is sent to the voters. I would need it now. Br, ferenc -- maemo.org sysadmin, developer email: fer...@maemo.org _______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list maemo-community@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
